I’m not political.
I was but New Labour destroyed my politics for me. Too much like old Tory. I suppose the centre ground drift of
politics generally might be good for stability but it’s so bloody boring. That said I do watch the Andrew Marr
Show on the BBC of a Sunday morning.
Today we had a double treat.
Michael Gove the Secretary of State for Education and all round twat and
Tristram Hunt who is the Shadow blah blah blah! And possibly Cockney Rhyming
Slang?
Michael Gove (I gove him a chance and listened?) who has one
of those faces that you feel like punching, (I bet he was the school snitch) was on mainly talking about
how to battle Islamist extremism in schools. And Tristram (not a real name surely? Tristan yes! Tristram
no!) was there declaring a ‘Master Teacher in every classroom.’ Now I’d not
heard of ‘Master Teachers’ apparently it’s an idea from Singapore. The ‘Master Teacher’ would be ‘better
trained’ or it would be a continued training from qualification and they would
… well, that wasn’t made clear.
Part of the argument was that to progress in teaching you have to go
into management so and I quote ‘Too many good teachers leave the classroom to
become heads.’
Class teachers up and down the country are raising eyebrows
(and a glass) and saying ‘Really?’ very slowly as they contemplate their own
head teachers.
Now I am all for the opportunity to progress as a class room
teacher because that’s the job I love.
You can keep the rest of it!
But I’m not sure ‘Master Teacher’ is the route. Who decides?
The argument went from a ‘Master Teacher’ in every classroom
to one in every school in a matter of minutes. ‘Master Teachers’, of course, would be more expensive than
‘Mistress Teachers’ – ‘Journeyman Teachers’ – I’m not sure what teachers who
aren’t ‘Master Teachers’ are going to be called. What head, went the argument, wouldn’t want a ‘Master
Teacher’ in their school. Heads
like cheap teachers! That’s the
holy grail; a ‘Master Teacher’ who costs the same as an NQT!
I have a feeling that it is too late for me. At my age I’ll be lucky to find another
job let alone be allowed to make any progression in my so-called career. The whole system seems to be aimed at
making the job untenable for people of a certain age so they can be replaced by
shiny new cheap versions who last a couple of years and then burn out to be
replaced by newer shinier versions.
Or is that too cynical?
No comments:
Post a Comment