Someone says (THE HEAD TEACHER) "We need to have a conversation."
Extrovert: "OH Great!'
Introvert: "OH God!!"
Thursday, 25 September 2014
Monday, 22 September 2014
NUT Magazine
The NUT – National Union of Teachers (when I started
teaching you had to be in a union – not sure with the rise of Free Schools and
Academies whether that is still true?) of whom I am a member have sent me their
new school year magazine with ‘a manifesto for our children’s education’. I have had a quick read through and am
shocked by the number of letters and articles and references to the apparent
‘culling of 50 plus teachers’ – that’s age not waist size! Though the latter may well be
vulnerable as well. It looks like
there’s a lot of it about. Nobody
wants us 50+ teachers, male or female! Apparently.
The main method of getting rid of them seems to be
competency and lesson observations!
Hmm my last one was RI (which seems to be the acronym for ‘Requires
Improvement” – like I have said before show me a lesson that doesn’t require
some improvement – I digress!) and I hear ominous cello music in the background
… There’s an encouraging letter, name and address supplied, from someone who
managed to go to tribunal and get an unfair dismissal verdict and one hopes a
good cash payout. But it seems
most just drift off quietly, like Scott’s Antartic explorers! Feeling the chill, someone close that
tent flap!
As was so kindly pointed out to me on our First INSET day –
I am the oldest teacher in the school!
Oh there are ancient teaching assistants amongst the teachers I am the
oldest. Actually the head is a year or two older than me but I am still in the
classroom. I think I should be
treated like the leader of the house!
It was interesting in a recent staff meeting where we were tracking data
that I was the only teacher who knew what the current year 6 children were like
as infants (they were my second year one class after moving down from Year 6)
and therefore the only person who knew where they had come from. I think it’s important that a school
has people who can do that, who know the children not just as data on a
spreadsheet. I do so love a
spreadsheet. It’s quite hard to
type sarcastically!
Anyway it’s time for my nap. Peace Out!
Thursday, 18 September 2014
How Long?
I did wonder how long it’d be before the spectre of OFSTED
(the inspection body not the cat! Long story) would be used as a
threat/motivation. Answer 3 weeks
well 2 and a half as it was the third staff meeting!
I would like to make the point that 90% of staff meetings
have nothing to do with EYFS and what we do! And I might be being generous with the claim that 10% do
have something to do with us!
The concern is that our 4b+ results for last year are not as
good as the previous year and it’s apparently a worry that HMI or OFSTED might
in a ‘desktop exercise’ notice this and despite our ‘good’ OFSTED rating come
to the school and sack the governors (volunteers so can they be sacked?) and
the headteacher and/or the senior management team. Well as I’m none of the above can I just say
‘Bovvered!’
Anyway during the ‘discussion’ where the head took on the
role of the OFSTED questioner someone, naively in my opinion, said that the
results were down to cohort. To which the head replied ‘So you’re blaming the
children?’
I have thought about this and I think my answer would be
yes! Then I thought I’d better
qualify it. If children were like
say pizzas or cars then the difference between the performance between one year
and the next would be a concern.
But children are not cars or pizzas! They are human beings and therefore more like complex
dynamic systems like the weather, where one little factor can change the
outcomes. It’s the butterfly in
the rain forest, flooding in China analogy. A little story, a few years ago there was a weather man,
Michael Fish, who said that there would not be a hurricane striking the south
of England and pedantically he was right there was no hurricane but an extreme
wind event (as it was referred as) did take place and they had to rename
SevenOaks!! Apparently 3 of
the 30 computer models of that 24 hours weather predicted high winds but 27
didn’t so the weather people went with the majority models! Oh how wrong they
were! But children are more like
these complex chaos theory models there are so many variables many of which are
outside of a teacher’s control. So
the same teacher can give the same input to a group of children and you may get
varying results! Actually because of the small cohorts slight differences are
skewed even more! When a single
child counts for 8% or more it doesn’t take much to make a mockery of
statistics! Interestingly the
national statistics for all these tests vary very little from year to year it’s
only at the micro level that you see the distortions – quantum theory anyone?
Anyone?
Mark Twain – ‘There are lies, damned lies and statistics.’
Peace Out
PS I am loving my new babies and looking forward to the new
year – staff meetings not withstanding!
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)