I did wonder how long it’d be before the spectre of OFSTED
(the inspection body not the cat! Long story) would be used as a
threat/motivation. Answer 3 weeks
well 2 and a half as it was the third staff meeting!
I would like to make the point that 90% of staff meetings
have nothing to do with EYFS and what we do! And I might be being generous with the claim that 10% do
have something to do with us!
The concern is that our 4b+ results for last year are not as
good as the previous year and it’s apparently a worry that HMI or OFSTED might
in a ‘desktop exercise’ notice this and despite our ‘good’ OFSTED rating come
to the school and sack the governors (volunteers so can they be sacked?) and
the headteacher and/or the senior management team. Well as I’m none of the above can I just say
‘Bovvered!’
Anyway during the ‘discussion’ where the head took on the
role of the OFSTED questioner someone, naively in my opinion, said that the
results were down to cohort. To which the head replied ‘So you’re blaming the
children?’
I have thought about this and I think my answer would be
yes! Then I thought I’d better
qualify it. If children were like
say pizzas or cars then the difference between the performance between one year
and the next would be a concern.
But children are not cars or pizzas! They are human beings and therefore more like complex
dynamic systems like the weather, where one little factor can change the
outcomes. It’s the butterfly in
the rain forest, flooding in China analogy. A little story, a few years ago there was a weather man,
Michael Fish, who said that there would not be a hurricane striking the south
of England and pedantically he was right there was no hurricane but an extreme
wind event (as it was referred as) did take place and they had to rename
SevenOaks!! Apparently 3 of
the 30 computer models of that 24 hours weather predicted high winds but 27
didn’t so the weather people went with the majority models! Oh how wrong they
were! But children are more like
these complex chaos theory models there are so many variables many of which are
outside of a teacher’s control. So
the same teacher can give the same input to a group of children and you may get
varying results! Actually because of the small cohorts slight differences are
skewed even more! When a single
child counts for 8% or more it doesn’t take much to make a mockery of
statistics! Interestingly the
national statistics for all these tests vary very little from year to year it’s
only at the micro level that you see the distortions – quantum theory anyone?
Anyone?
Mark Twain – ‘There are lies, damned lies and statistics.’
Peace Out
PS I am loving my new babies and looking forward to the new
year – staff meetings not withstanding!
No comments:
Post a Comment